About a week or so ago I talked about translating the Apostolic Fathers for the Loeb Classical Library. Some people have asked me to say more about the Apostolic Fathers. It may be useful to devote a couple of posts to this collection: when were these authors first gathered together? Who decides which books should be included in the corpus? On what grounds? Etc. For much of this I draw from the Introduction in my edition.
The term “apostolic father” first occurs in the Hogedos of Anastasius, the seventh-century anti-monophysite abbot of St. Catherine’s monastery on Mount Sinai, who spoke of “the apostolic father Dionysius the Areopagite.” Somewhat ironically, the works of Dionysius the Areopagite, allegedly the convert of the apostle Paul (Acts 17:34), have never been included in modern collections of the Apostolic Fathers: since the sixteenth century they have been recognized as forgeries of later times (possibly the early sixth century). (They are still fascinating reading: but they are not writings by someone from the generation after the apostles.) In any event, neither Anastasius nor any other author prior to the seventeenth century referred to an entire corpus of writings (or authors) as the “Apostolic Fathers.”
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, log in as a Member. Click here for membership options. If you don’t belong yet, JOIN!!
Hi Bart,
I was wondering what your take is on the book of Hermas. I cannot understand it properly… According to his second vision, he borrowed the angel’s book to make a copy (in his vision/dream), managed to make one (and take it to his “real life) but could only understand it 2 weeks later after fasting? What is you opinion of him, super fanatic/delusional or “lying” to make make his points acceptable by the church?
In terms of copying the book, the most celebrated point is that he says he copied it by the letter because he could not make out the syllables; that’s usually taken to mean that he had a very basic training in writing.
Thanks Bart! So just to get my head around it, do you think he had a dream and wrote the book (while dreaming) and brought it back to life (that might have been a long night writing letter by letter lol) and then was able to understand it 2 weeks later?
No, I think he thought he saw a woman who handed him the book to coy.