Sorting by

×

1 Enoch: The Scripture Quoted by Jude

In my posts on Jude (In a Nutshell) I pointed out that the book quotes the apocryphal Jewish writing known as 1 Enoch.  Many of you will not be intimately familiar with this intriguing book, so I thought I should spend a couple of posts explaining what it is. I have taken the following from my book Journeys to Heaven and Hell (Yale University Press, 2022);  I discuss 1 Enoch there because it does indeed narrate a visit to the realms of the dead by a mere mortal – unlike anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.  Here is what I say there, in a slightly edited version.  (This will take two posts.) ******************************* The Hebrew Bible never describes the realms of the dead.   Samuel is temporarily summoned from death at Saul’s request, but he does not describe what it was like (2 Samuel 28); Elijah ascends to heaven, but we never learn what he sees there (2 Kings 2); Ezekiel has a vision of the throne room of God, but not the dwelling places [...]

2025-10-02T09:58:38-04:00September 30th, 2025|Afterlife, Early Judaism|

Jude as Pseudepigraphic (i.e., forged)

I concluded my previous post by indicating that a number of Christian readers/leaders in the ancient world considered Jude not to be authentic – that is, that it was a forgery written in the name of Jesus’s brother by someone else.  Here I continue the discussion, again taken from my study, Forgery and Counterforgery (Oxford University Press, 2013) ******************************                Modern times have seen a healthy split among scholars who see the book as authentically written by the brother of Jesus and of James, and those who consider it forged.[1] Numerous factors give the palm to the latter group.  For one thing, book gives every indication of being  produced relatively late in the first century, after the “age of the apostles.”  The apostles themselves are referred to as living in the past, and as predicting the “last time” when the author is now living – differentiated from the time of the apostles themselves (Jude 17-18). Moreover, the author speaks of “the faith” as the content of the body of knowledge that makes [...]

2025-09-26T13:47:56-04:00September 28th, 2025|Catholic Epistles, Forgery in Antiquity|

Book of Jude: Who Wrote it? When? And Why? (part 1)

In my previous post I explained the major themes and emphases of the letter of Jude, including some of its most intriguing and even unexpected features (e.g., quoting apocryphal tales/texts as seemingly authoritative scripture).  In this post and the next I will deal with the thorny questions of who actually wrote it, when, and why. Since it claims to be written by “Jude, the brother of James” it is traditionally been understood to have been penned by Jesus’s own brother, Jude (Mark 6:3).  Is that right? As I’ve done a few times before, I’ve decided to provide a longer and more nuanced discussion in this case about whether it is in fact a forgery.  The following is drawn from my book Forgery and Counterforgery  (Oxford University Press, 2013).  I’ve edited it in places to make it more accessible to broader audiences.  This will take two posts. ****************************** Jude is the shortest forgery of the New Testament, and like many of the others, it is filled with invective against its opponents, even if [...]

2025-09-26T13:55:30-04:00September 27th, 2025|Catholic Epistles, Forgery in Antiquity|

Heaven, the Hedonic Treadmill, and Homer (Simpson) Platinum Post by Douglas Wadeson MD

I'm happy to post this guest contribution from Platinum member Doug Wadeson. He raises a question most of us probably haven’t thought much about: if eternity is endless bliss, would we actually enjoy it? Or would it get… boring? --------------------------------------------------- My favorite TV series is the old Twilight Zone by Rod Serling.  There is an episode in which a small-time crook named Rocky Valentine is shot and ends up in a beautiful place.  Everything is at his fingertips: food, booze, money, women.  He wins every time he gambles.  He gets every beautiful woman he wants.  He doesn’t understand how he deserved all this.  But he becomes increasingly frustrated: it’s all too easy; he gets no kicks from it.  I won’t spoil the ending – you might want to look for the episode the next time SyFy or another channel has a TZ marathon: “A Nice Place to Visit” from season 1, written by Charles Beaumont.  Let’s just say he has a rude awakening about the reality of his situation.  I think this raises a valid [...]

2025-09-27T15:35:32-04:00September 26th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Letter of Jude in a Nutshell

We come now in this “New Testament in a Nutshell” series to the penultimate book of the canon, the short letter of Jude.  I begin by giving a one-sentence ,fifty-word summary of the book, before, in this post, explaining more fully its themes and emphases.  The letter of Jude warns its unnamed readers of ungodly teachers who promote lawless living and who, along with their followers, will suffer the severe condemnation of God on the day of judgment, just like other apostates discussed in Scripture, both humans and angels, who turned to lives of disobedience.  It is clear at the outset that this letter is principally is concerned with false teachers who have invaded the Christian community.  As he says: Beloved … I find it necessary to write and appeal to you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints. For certain intruders have stolen in among you, people who long ago were designated for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our God [...]

2025-09-25T13:21:12-04:00September 25th, 2025|Catholic Epistles|

Cleopatra, Virgin Births, and Professional Scribes: More about antiquity…

Here are yet three more excellent questions I have received from blog readers, all of them both interesting and important. QUESTION: I recently came across a rather bold and curious linguistic claim regarding the term ‘Paraclete’ within the Gospel of John, and I was hoping to ask your opinion of it. To be exact, it theorizes that the word “Parakletos” may be translated as “praised in excess over” or “glorified in excess over”. Apparently, according to this claim, the word “kleos” (κλέος) translates to “glory” or “renown”. An example cited to support this theory is the Queen Cleopatra, whose name is the Latinised form of the Ancient Greek Kleopatra, meaning “glory of her father”, derived from ‘kleos’ meaning “glory” and ‘pater’ meaning “father”. So, according to this theory, if we adopt the meaning of “praise” or “glory”, then the verbal adjective ‘kletos’ can be translated as “praised” or “glorified”. The resultant alternative literal translation apparently renders ‘parakletos’ as “praised more than/in excess over” or “glorified more than/in excess over”.  If I may ask, in [...]

2025-09-21T10:23:54-04:00September 24th, 2025|Reader’s Questions|

Questions on Forgeries, Historical Errors, and Alterations of Texts!

I'm catching up on posting some of the very interesting questions I've received from blog readers.  This will take a couple of posts.  Here are three excellent ones, all going to the heart of what it means to engage in a historical/critical assessment of the New Testament.   QUESTION: Hey Bart, I have a question about the acceptance of the Deutero-Pauline epistles. If they were written while Paul was still alive, it seems like he would have said those weren’t his, and to knock it off. If they were written after Paul had died, it seems like his closest companions would have said that Paul had already died, the epistles were fake, and to knock it off – especially if the epistles were written years after Paul had died. So my question is, why were the Deutero-Pauline epistles accepted? RESPONSE: It was nearly impossible for authors in the ancient world to know which books were forged in their name and circulated, except by accident.  If someone in, say, Smyrna, forged a book [...]

2025-09-21T10:13:33-04:00September 23rd, 2025|Reader’s Questions|

A New Way to Support the Blog: Become a Blog Steward

When I started the blog back in 2012, I had two main goals. The first was to take the historical study of the New Testament and early Christianity out of the academy and make it available to anyone who wanted to learn. The second was to do some good with it. From the very beginning, every membership fee has gone straight to charity. That’s now added up to more than $3 million for organizations fighting hunger, homelessness, and more. But here’s the reality: because every membership fee is passed directly to charity, the blog itself doesn’t keep a penny to cover its own expenses. Running this site costs money (staff, technology, infrastructure, growth). Those costs have only ever been met by a handful of generous supporters working quietly behind the scenes. Without them, there would be no blog, no community, and no charitable giving. Now we’re opening that small group of supporters more formally, and inviting you to become a Blog Steward. (You can proudly call yourself a BS’er!) What It Is A Blog Steward [...]

2025-11-12T15:13:27-05:00September 22nd, 2025|Public Forum|

Some Reflections on Our (My) Finitude and the Fear of Death

I have come up with a new way of thinking about our finitude, about the fact that we all die and (in my view) that’s the end of the story.  At least I think it’s a new way.  I don’t recall ever hearing or reading it.  If it is a common view, or a least a view that is out there (and/or long has been!), I have no doubt some of you will tell me. First, some background: My new (to me) thought is predicated, as I just indicated, on my personal opinion that death is the end of the story for each of us, an opinion many of you will heartily disagree with.  I began to hold this opinion when I became an agnostic/atheist some thirty years ago or so.  I don’t think we have souls  that are somehow separate from our physical/material beings or that will live on after we die.  I think this bodily existence is all we will ever have. Many people find that view deeply depressing and [...]

2025-09-21T10:06:19-04:00September 21st, 2025|Public Forum|

The DeuteroPauline Epistles “At a Glance,” With Questions for Reflection

In this post I give an executive summary (“At a Glance”) of the Deutero-Pauline letters (2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, and Colossians) and then provide some questions for deeper reflection on these books that claim to be written by Paul but are widely considered by critical scholars to be penned by later followers claiming to be him.   AT A GLANCE: The Deutero-Pauline Epistles The Deutero-Pauline epistles are 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, and Colossians. Critical scholars debate whether or not Paul wrote these books. 2 Thessalonians sounds like 1 Thessalonians in some ways, but its understanding of eschatology—particularly when the end will come (not right away, according to this book)—does not sound Pauline. Colossians responds to a group of false teachers who promote a kind of Jewish mysticism; its writing style and theology seem quite different from Paul’s—especially with respect to its understanding of the resurrection of believers (which it takes to be a past event). Ephesians is a circular letter dealing with the relationship of Jew and Gentile in the church. Again, the vocabulary, [...]

2025-09-25T13:20:01-04:00September 20th, 2025|Forgery in Antiquity, Paul and His Letters|

1, 2, and 3 John: For Further Reading

Now that I have discussed the themes, emphases, authors and occasions of the “Johannine epistles” (1, 2, and 3 John) I can provide some suggestions for further reading.  These are all important works written by scholars for non-scholars.  I have given brief annotations for each book to give you a sense of what it’s about and so help you decide which, if any, might be worth your while. I have divided the list into three sections: Books that provide important discussion of one or more of these Catholic epistles, and of the problem of persecution dealt with in 1 Peter. Commentaries that give lengthy introductions to all matters of importance about the book of Acts and then go passage by passage to provide more detailed interpretation (that’s where you can dig more deeply into “what does this particular word actually mean?”; “what is the real point of this passage”; how does this passage relate to what Luke says elsewhere in his two-volume work or to what we can find in other parts of the New [...]

2025-09-18T23:14:30-04:00September 18th, 2025|Public Forum|

2 John and 3 John in a Single Nutshell

In this post I continue my summaries of the books of the New Testament “In a Nutshell” by turning to the letters of 2 and 3 John.  Because these are so brief, I will deal with them together in a single post, explaining their themes and emphases and exploring the question of who wrote them, when, and why.   For a one-sentence, fifty word summary of the two together, how ‘bout this:   2 and 3 John are letters by an author called the “elder,” the first addressed to a community and the other to one of its prominent members, warning against believers who preach a false understanding of Christ and who refuse to welcome Christian travelers because they disagree with their views.   I can now move on to a more extensive overview of these two books. On one level, they are not nearly as difficult to read as, say, the Gospel of John. Each of them is short and direct, taking up only a page each, about average for most [...]

2025-09-17T10:59:10-04:00September 17th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Weird Textual Variant of 1 John 4:3: False Teachers Who “Loose” Jesus?

This post will be about a couple of intriguing textual variants in our manuscripts of the New Testament, including the use of a four-letter word (literally) in 1 John.  To set the stage, let me remind you that in my previous post I discussed an early Christian understanding of Christ that I called “separationist,” because it divided Jesus Christ into two: the man Jesus (who was completely human) and the divine Christ (who was completely divine).  According to most proponents of this view, the man Jesus was temporarily indwelt by the divine being, Christ, enabling him to perform his miracles and deliver his teachings; but prior to Jesus’ death, the Christ abandoned him, forcing him to face his crucifixion alone. This separationist Christology was most commonly advocated by groups of Christians that scholars have called “Gnostic.”  As you may know, te term Gnosticism comes from the Greek word for knowledge, “gnosis.”  It is applied to a wide range of groups of early Christians who stressed the importance of secret knowledge for salvation.  According to most [...]

2025-09-15T18:47:02-04:00September 16th, 2025|Early Christian Doctrine, New Testament Manuscripts|

Was Jesus Christ Two Beings, One Human (Jesus) and One Divine (Christ)?

Just to show how strange and, uh, detailed scholarship can be even in New Testament studies, I want to conclude this small thread on the five-chapter book of 1 John by discussing a textual variant in its text that I was obsessed with for years.  It involves how different manuscripts word just one verse (1 John 4:3), and in fact just one word in that one verse, which is, as it turns out, only a four-letter word.   Early in my career I wrote a 22-page article on this word.  Ha! (I guess that's over five pages per letter....) The word is "LUEI" (in Greek) and it means "to loose."  It is found as an alternative reading for 1 John 4:3, which in nearly all our surviving textual witnesses says (I've highlighted the key words): "Every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not of God.  This is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you heard that it was coming and now is in the world already."  I talked about the meaning [...]

1 John: Who Wrote It, When, and Why?

In my previous post I provided a summary of the main themes and emphases of 1 John; now I can turn to the question of Who, Why, and When. They question of “who wrote it” has long been discussed, and almost always in relationship to the Gospel of John.  Neither book mentions the name John; neither identifies its author; and neither refers directly to the other.  Even so, as I pointed out in my discussion of John (see: https://ehrmanblog.org/the-gospel-of-john-who-wrote-it-when-and-why/ ), the Gospel was from early times said to have been written by John the son of Zebedee.  And since 1 John (along with 2 and 3 John) seemed so similar in many ways to the Gospel, it was assumed to have been written by him as well.  Hence the titles they received, as the Epistles of John. Among the shared themes of the Gospel and Epistles of John are the following: The images of light and darkness (1 John 1:5–7; 1 John 2:9–11; cf. John 8:12; John 12:46) The new and old commandments [...]

2025-09-15T18:34:42-04:00September 13th, 2025|Catholic Epistles|

1 John in a Nutshell

I move now in this “NT in a Nutshell” series to provide an overview of the epistle of 1 John, one of the General or Catholic Epistles.  This short, five-chapter book is normally called a “letter” even though it does not have the standard features of an ancient piece of correspondence. Normally (not just in the New Testament, but in the ancient world generally) personal correspondence used several standard conventions (just as today you might write a letter to your IRS agent and begin with Dear Mr. Elliott, even if you are not endeared to him at all: it’s a convention).  As a rule, letters had fairly fixed features at the beginning; e.g. the author names themselves, indicates to whom they are writing, extends some kind of greeting, often indicates a prayer being said for the person and/or a thanks to God for them.  Then they get down to the business of what they want to say, and typically end the letter with some words of encouragement, consolation, or admonition, an expression of hope to [...]

2025-09-15T18:30:34-04:00September 11th, 2025|Catholic Epistles|

My First Scholarly Encounter with the Canon of the New Testament

So: I've started to work on my next book (or books, depending on how things go), on how we got the canon of the New Testament.  Why these 27 books?  Why not others?  Who decided?  When?  On what grounds?  etc. I started thinking about this issue already as an 18-year-old in Bible college, but at that point had the traditional theological answers for it that are still being published regularly by evangelical scholars as if they are "news" (!).  We saw it as a divinely directed event with an inevitable outcome in which the inspired books were the ones that were included simply because they were the ones recognized as being inspired by God. When I went to Princeton Seminary, for my Masters and then PhD, it was primarily to work with Bruce Metzger, because he was the world leading expert on ancient Greek manuscripts of the New Testament.  He was also the foremost scholar of the day on the formation of the canon of Scripture (and published the still authoritative account of it, over [...]

2025-09-12T00:23:19-04:00September 10th, 2025|Bart’s Biography, Canonical Gospels|

Why Wasn’t Peter’s Apocalypse Included in the New Testament?

As I indicated in my previous post, I’m planning to write a book (after the one on charity in early Christianity) explaining how we got the canon of the New Testament.  Who choose the books?  On what grounds?  And when? In this post I thought I'd show the kind of think I'll be interested in, by explaining a particularly intriguing issue of "what got in" and "what got out" that I worked on a good bit a few years ago when writing my book Journeys to Heaven and Hell  (Yale University Press), and then blogged on. It involves one of the books that did not make it into the canon (there are several!) allegedly written by Peter.  Unlike most of the others, though, this one nearly made it.  In the end, it was axed.  But why?  Not for a reason most anyone would suspect (or at least no one had suggested in writing before my book). Here's how I explain it all in the prospectus I sent to my publisher, Simon&Schuster when I was proposing to [...]

My Next Book: Creating the Bible — How We Got the Canon of the New Testament

Now that my book Love Thy Stranger is done, in press, being prepared for publication (March 24!  You can preorder it with a price guarantee from Amazon already), and, as far as I am concerned with, over and done with, I have moved on to the next project, or projects.  I THINK it will be two -- a trade book for general audiences and an academic book for scholars, both on how we got the canon of the New Testament. My tentative title, which will no doubt be changed roughly 79 times before we come up with the final one, is CREATING THE BIBLE: How We Got the Twenty-Seven Books of Christian Scripture.  Three years ago or so I wrote up a prospectus for my publisher, Simon & Schuster, and shared it with blog readers.  I thought it would be a good time now to put it up again along with a couple of relevant posts just to get the juices starting to flow (before I return in a few days to the "New Testament in a Nutshell Series"!). [...]

2025-09-12T00:22:04-04:00September 7th, 2025|Bart’s Biography, Book Discussions, Public Forum|

Paul’s Letters to the Philippians and to Philemon, “At a Glance” and with Questions for Reflection

I have been providing bullet-point summaries of the books of the New Testament, based on my fuller "nutshell summaries,"  along with some questions to think about in reflecting on the books.  With this post I will complete the undisputed Pauline epistles, that is, the seven letters that by virtual consensus are considered to be authentically from Paul's hand, by dealing with two, the letters to the Philippians and the only one of these letters to an individual, Philemon. Again, if you want to refresh your memory on the books, they are short (Philemon is a single page!) and not complicated to re(read); you can find my posts on them here: Philippians Philippians in a Nutshell Philippians: Who Wrote It? When and Why? Philippians: For Further Reading The Most Widely Discussed Passage of Philippians Philemon Philemon in a Nutshell Philemon and the Morality of Slavery Philemon: For Further Reading At a Glance:  Philippians The letter is written to Christians that Paul had converted in the city of Philippi, in eastern Macedonia. Paul wrote [...]

2025-09-10T13:13:08-04:00September 6th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|
Go to Top