Robert said
Steefen said
Robert
Isn’t that essentially what Bart said to you?
Steefen
I want more. I want at least two scholarly articles and at least two scholarly book/s concluding Paul was not persecuting in Judea.
Go ahead and look for them, but you won’t find consensus and certitude, unless its of your own making. You will find scholars on both sides of this question. Some (eg, Hultgren JBL March 1976) will still want to interpret Paul’s words in such a way that they do not contradict the later account in Acts. Others (eg, Haenchen, Bart) will be more skeptical of the account in Acts and interpret Paul at ‘face’ (!) value.
Here is the Arland Hulgren article from 1976.
** you do not have permission to see this link **
FYI:
The Acts of the Apostles, A Commentary by Ernst Haenchen
The pdf shows Hulgren with a “T”: Hultgren: Paul’s Pre-Christian Persecutions.
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
With Paul not persecuting the Jerusalem “Church” (a Hellenistic term) of the disciples remaining after Jesus’ ascension, who was he persecuting?
To begin with, Acts says he approved the persecution of the Hellenist Christian leader, Stephen. Extending that and if “I persecuted” has truth,
there were Hellenist Christians outside of Judea and Galilee.
Arland Hultgren / Wagner College Staten Island
[Saul] looks upon “Judaism” and the “church” as split into two recognizable communities. Saul opposed the Church (a Hellenistic term, not synagogues in Judea and Galilee that may have adopted some of the teachings of Jesus). Saul opposed the Church [for argument sake, let’s say the proselyte Queen Helena with ties back to Edessa heard of Jesus and back in Edessa, not only did some people follow her in adopting Judaism, they also adopted some of the teachings of Jesus] as a movement outside of Judaism, its parent body, i.e., as a rival religion.
Saul would have seen the Christian movement subject to Jewish authority. Paul, outside of his Jewish community, would see his new community no longer subject to the parent body of Judaism–made clear by his stance on the Law and circumcision.
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
The vision Saul would have had of Jesus would have been a Jesus whose Heavenly Father turned his face away from his Son and would have been a Jesus excommunicated from the Jewish community. A fatherless and excommunicated Jesus would not be compelled to have Paul or the non-Jewish Church recite the Our Father prayer.
Bart D.E.
I’m not sure what you’re asking. Are you asking who actually fulfilled the prophecy of Deuteronony 18? I’m not sure who the author had in mind any one person; possibly he is simply referring to future prophets.
Steefen
Given:
The New Moses: A Matthean Typology by Dale Allison
We agree Dale Allison’s book is about 1) The New Moses and 2) the gospel of Matthew.
Dale writes about three times the Moses story is mirrored by the author of Matthew writing about Jesus:
a) Pharaoh slaughtered infants because of Moses / Herod the Great slaughtered infants because of Jesus.
b) Before the midwives came at the birth of Moses ** you do not have permission to see this link **
c) Allison analyzes the ten miracles of Matthew chapters 8 and 9 as a link to the ten plagues of exodus
Part II of Dale’s book: “The New Moses in Matthew”
Appendix IV: The New Moses and the Son of God
p. 6 of the book’s introduction: [The gospel of Matthew is a new whole made out of old pieces.]
Made out of the Old Moses is the New Moses, the Jesus in the gospel of Matthew. There was an old Passover and covenant with Moses and a new Passover and covenant with Jesus.
QUESTIONS:
Jesus represented a new covenant for Paul, yes?
Bart D.E.: Yes
It is not uncommon in scholarly literature (not only with Dale) to see comparisons between Moses and Jesus, yes?
Bart D.E.: Yes (for Matthew’s Gospel). But Dale did it more thoroughly than had happened before him.
Steefen said
The pdf shows Hulgren with a “T”: Hultgren: Paul’s Pre-Christian Persecutions.
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
With Paul not persecuting the Jerusalem “Church” (a Hellenistic term) of the disciples remaining after Jesus’ ascension, who was he persecuting?
To begin with, Acts says he approved the persecution of the Hellenist Christian leader, Stephen. Extending that and if “I persecuted” has truth,
there were Hellenist Christians outside of Judea and Galilee.
Arland Hultgren / Wagner College Staten Island
[Saul] looks upon “Judaism” and the “church” as split into two recognizable communities. Saul opposed the Church (a Hellenistic term, not synagogues in Judea and Galilee that may have adopted some of the teachings of Jesus). Saul opposed the Church [for argument sake, let’s say the proselyte Queen Helena with ties back to Edessa heard of Jesus and back in Edessa, not only did some people follow her in adopting Judaism, they also adopted some of the teachings of Jesus] as a movement outside of Judaism, its parent body, i.e., as a rival religion.
Saul would have seen the Christian movement subject to Jewish authority. Paul, outside of his Jewish community, would see his new community no longer subject to the parent body of Judaism–made clear by his stance on the Law and circumcision.
Hultgren
A partial consensus has developed that Paul persecuted only the Hellenistic wing of the church (Bultmann).
= = =
Robert said
Steefen said
Robert
Isn’t that essentially what Bart said to you?
Steefen
I want more. I want at least two scholarly articles and at least two scholarly book/s concluding Paul was not persecuting in Judea.
Go ahead and look for them, but you won’t find consensus and certitude, unless its of your own making. You will find scholars on both sides of this question. Some (eg, Hultgren JBL March 1976) will still want to interpret Paul’s words in such a way that they do not contradict the later account in Acts. Others (eg, Haenchen, Bart) will be more skeptical of the account in Acts and interpret Paul at ‘face’ (!) value.
Robert, thank you. Hultgren answered one of the questions.
What was the nature of the persecution?
Answer: The possibilities were imprisonment or flogging.
(pick up at pages 105-111)
The article makes a case in a foreign language, so I cannot follow its line of reasoning.
The conclusion from the foreign language section is Saul persecuted in the vicinity of Jerusalem before persecuting outside of Judea.
Well, we do not know if Stephen existed.
We do not know how the Hellenists developed a Christology of salvation.
The Biblical Jesus was Jewish purist.
The article purports that were Gentile Christians who were not proselytes.
It’s one thing for God-fearers and proselytes to make pilgrimages to the Temple and bring back religious experiences to places outside of Judea and Galilee.
Why is Stephen saying the exact same thing that got Jesus in trouble: you will see the Son of Man at the right hand of the Power?
Bart said Jesus had few followers. Say more about that. The followers included Jews, proselytes, God-fearers, Hellenists and Gentiles.
With Jesus healing the slave of a Roman centurion, who is Saul to persecute those Jesus favored? I’m sure Saul did not persecute a Roman centurion–flog him or imprison him.
Non-Jews could be thrown into Jewish prison for not being orthodox?
Non-Jews could be flogged for not being orthodox?
Now Stephen, who was full of grace and power, was performing great wonders and signs among the people.
But resistance arose from what was called the Synagogue of the Freedmen, including Cyrenians, Alexandrians, and men from the provinces of Cilicia and Asia.
Then they prompted some men to say, “We heard Stephen speak words of blasphemy against Moses and against God.”
So they stirred up the people, elders, and scribes and confronted Stephen. They seized him and brought him before the Sanhedrin
For we have heard him say that Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs that Moses handed down to us.
Acts Chapter 6
St. Stephen:
You stiff-necked people with uncircumcised hearts and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit, just as your fathers did.
Result: the Sanhedrin stoned him to death.
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
Hultgren should have mentioned this. Persecution did include killing. The Sanhedrin set an example for Saul the persecutor.
Hultgren
Paul does not understand persecution as a procedure which ends in death for the victim.
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
Given Luke’s Acts of the Apostle, Hultgren has no credibility with that statement.
Hultgren
The Christian movement was considered–from the Jewish side–subject to the disciplinary authorities within Judaism;
in Acts, Paul works on behalf of the Sanhedrin, of which he is himself portrayed as a member … [Acts 26: 10
as a member of the Sanhedrin, I too cast votes to condemn saints to death. Also Acts 22: 4]
Steve Campbell, Author of Historical Accuracy
So, Saul was dragging people out of their homes to throw them into a prison’s death row.
Third question: any Jesus community outside of Judea and Galilee claiming Jesus was the Way is using ** you do not have permission to see this link **? What else could they be using?
Robert
I don’t understand your question, or its relevance to this discussion.
Steefen
Saul was persecuting those following the Way. The Way is mentioned at John 14: 6. But what is a better reference?
Google, where is information about Paul’s Persecution of Christians / biblehub Paul’s Persecution of Christians in his letters
Undisputed Authorship of the Pauline Epistles according to Wikipedia – Authentic Pauline Epistles
** you do not have permission to see this link **
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Undisputed and Disputed Authorship of the Pauline Epistles according to Wikpedia – Deutero-Pauline Epistles, May Be Authentic
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Robert
Apparently, you think there are only five (not seven) letters of Paul that are authentic. Are you claiming that one or two of these three letters is inauthentic? If so, why?
Steefen
Wikipedia (First Epistle to the Corinthians entry) reports First Corinthians contains a passage that is widely believed to have been ** you do not have permission to see this link ** into the text by a later scribe:
As in all the churches of the saints, women should be silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as the law also says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
— Bible 1 Corinthians 14:34–35, NRSV
The verses are included in all extant manuscripts. Part of the reason for suspecting that this passage is an interpolation is that in several manuscripts in the Western tradition, it is placed at the end of Chapter 14, instead of at its canonical location. This kind of variability is generally considered by textual critics to be a sign that a note, initially placed in the margins of the document, has been copied into the body of the text by a scribe.** you do not have permission to see this link **
The passage also has been taken to contradict 11:5, where ** you do not have permission to see this link **
Robert said
Steefen said
Third question: any Jesus community outside of Judea and Galilee claiming Jesus was the Way is using ** you do not have permission to see this link **? What else could they be using?
Robert
I don’t understand your question, or its relevance to this discussion.
Steefen
Saul was persecuting those following the Way. The Way is mentioned at John 14: 6. But what is a better reference?
Luke indicates in Acts that before the followers of Jesus were first known as ‘Christians’ in Antioch (11,26), the movement was simply referred to as ‘the Way’ (18,25 19,9 19,23 24,14.22; cf also Mt 7,13). I’ve always thought that this was likely derived from the Hebrew term הלכה (halakhah), which literally means ‘the walking’ and is used for specific teachings on how one is to understand and follow the law of Moses. I’m told Amy Jill Levine also supports this view. Others, eg, Jeffrey P. García, think ‘the Way’ might be derived more literally from the Hebrew term דרך (derek) which is translated ‘way’. He finds this term also used similarly by later rabbis. It’s possible that John 14,6 reflects a a later christoloical adaptation of this earlier usage.
1 Luke 18: 25 easier for a camel to walk though city gates than a rich man to enter the Kingdom
2 Matthew 7: 13 Take the narrow Way not the broad Way (probably from the Sermon on the Mount)
3 Luke 19: 9 Herod wishes to see Jesus
4 Luke 19: 23-24 verse from Parable of Ten Minas
5 Luke 14:22 verse from Parable of the Banquet
Steefen
Given the story of Jesus in the gospels, it is a stretch to sum following Jesus as simply “the Way.”
I could see, maybe, the Way to pass Judgement for entering the Kingdom of the Son of Man.
First, the followers of Jesus inside and outside of Judea and Galilee would have to be convinced
of the Apocalyptic Formula of John the Baptist and Jesus: Repentance followed by Tribulation followed by Judgement followed by Kingdom.
Maybe your 1 and 2 can, in a small way, be picked up for a hook slogan for Jesus followers. Personally, the Way better refers to Daoism.
Robert said
Not the gospel of Luke, but Luke’s second volume: Acts 18,25 19,9 19,23 22,4 & 24,14.
I am looking for something before the gospel of John was written.
I look at the Acts verses when I get a chance.
Saul persecuting people of the Way would need that term established during the alleged life of Jesus of the late 20s to no later than 33 CE when Paul allegedly was persecuting the Church of God.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)
